OroPlatform Forums

Covering OroPlatform topics, including community updates and company announcements.

This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  Yurii Muratov 6 years, 5 months ago.

Starting from March 1, 2020 the forum has been switched to the read-only mode. Please head to StackOverflow for support.

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #34464

    Hi All,

    Could you please advice on following question.
    In our application we are going to use only one organization — default one.
    Can we change some parts of the ownership scope by removing organization?
    What we are going to do:
    # not add/remove column organization_id from entities
    # not add/remove “organization_field_name”=”organization” and “organization_column_name”=”organization_id” from entities config.
    # the ownership scope will be presented by

    So, will we face any unexpected issues with this?
    Is it ok to configure entities on this way or it’s not recommended at all?

    Thanks in advance

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #34465

    akhristiansen
    Participant

    I think that can cause some issues. I`m not recommend you to remove this config field.

    #34466

    Yurii Muratov
    Participant

    Hi, aliaksandra.chyrkova.
    It is not recommend to remove the organization field name and organization column name from the ownership parameter in case if the owner type is USER or BUSUNESS_UNIT. All the code that works with such ownership types expects organization field and column data.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

The forum ‘OroPlatform – Programming Questions’ is closed to new topics and replies.

Back to top